Mr. Carney Manheim township school district

Broth advised the attorney about the procedures that he should use while conducting his investigation. Later in the fall, the WPD hired an attorney to investigate allegations that Carney had vandalized department property. Around the same time, Broth, counsel for Carney and the Town in the Chatel case, informed Carney that he was withdrawing as his counsel but would continue representing the Town. In the summer of 2012, Carney was accused of making harassing telephone calls to Louis Chatel, the plaintiff in a lawsuit against Carney and the Town.

Factual Background1 Carney served on the Weare Police Department (“WPD”) for over twenty years, achieving the rank of Lieutenant in 2007. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 750 F.3d 91, 96 (1st Cir. The standard “is the same as that for a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).” Frappier v. Judgment on the pleadings is appropriate if “the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to establish a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Id. Legal Standard In assessing a motion for judgment on the pleadings, the court construes “all well-pleaded facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and draw all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.” Najas Realty, LLC v. The defendants move for judgment on the pleadings on several of Carney’s claims.

Carney brings suit against the Town of Weare (“the Town”), its Board of Selectman, its Town Administrator, several of its police officers, and its legal counsel, Mark Broth, alleging state and federal claims arising from his employment as an officer in the Weare Police Department. 66 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE James J.

Mr. Carney Manheim township school district